
-----------------------------------
habarnam
02 Oct 2006 10:56


-----------------------------------
OK . M-am uitat dupa preturi si ce mi-ai recomandat tu e dublu ... nu prea pot ..

Ar mai fi acel 80/600 de la celestron, care are review-uri foarte bune pentru banii aia .. si e doar 400$..cu micile lui neajusri (nu are focuser crayford)

si din ce vad .. o mica eroare de colimare ..

"Ok, now, finally, I will tell if it is any good, to which the simple answer is &#8220;Yes.&#8221; In fact optically it is without doubt the best small telescope (100mm and smaller) that I have ever used. The correction is almost perfect, and the lenses show a pretty smooth surface finish when star testing. Mine has a TINY bit of mis-collimation, but most people would never see it. It shows in a Cheshire in an academic way, but in real life, it is only visible on very bright stars when seeing causes the diffraction rings to flare a bit more brightly on one side than on the other. Like I said, I KNOW it is there, but in practice, the collimation error is WELL within the 3 arc-minute limit required for high-contrast viewing."

Voi ce intelegeti ?

Mai caut niste ED 100 acceptabile.. sa vedem ce gasesc

Multam de ajutor !  :)
