----------------------------------- Mircea Pteancu 01 Ian 2014 20:37 ----------------------------------- Dbird Nu incurajez incepatorii sa ia in serios afirmatiile tale. Supralicitezi in mod nejustificat importanta acoperirilor antireflex. Citeste cele zise de tine vreunul ca si desteptul ala de pe Cloudy Night care a scris ca Galilei de aceea nu a avut lunete bune deoarece pe atunci ''nu se inventasera acoperirile AR care asigura acromatismul imaginii'' ...si gata pocinogu'. Oare daca as transmite sfaturile tale de mai sus celor din forumul Classic Telescopes de pe CN sau celor de la Antique Telescopes Society, se vor autodesfiinta ?Tu ce crezi? Eu tare as vrea,deoarece as putea oferi gazduire catorva dintre telescoapele si binoclurile lor devenite inutile in virtutea mesajului tau. Nu-i vorba de binocluri dar e vorba de Zeiss in cele scrise mai jos de catre Thomas Jensen in ajunul Craciunului.De notat ca in completa contradictie cu cele scrise de tine,Thomas vorbeste despre utilizarea de lunete Telementor Zeiss de 63mm ,vechi de peste 22 de ani iar luneta semiapocromatica de 85mm are deja aproape un secol. Nu ''in exclusivitate'' ,ci ''si''.Ceea ce mi se pare corect din orice punct de vedere. Ori ''recomandarile'' tale de mai sus inseamna respingerea oricarei optici care nu este o chinezarie. Ceea ce nu este corect din nici un punct de vedere. Se poate formula si altfel. .............................................................................................. Re: What can you see with a 80mm scope or smaller [Re: bremms] #6271291 - 12/24/13 07:42 PM Edit post Edit Reply to this post Reply Reply to this post Quote Quick Reply: Quick Reply I don't mind taking out a large scope, if the weather is stable and I can use it for at least an hour, preferably more, before the clouds roll in again. If the weather is iffy and the sucker hole is unstable and perhaps closing in half an hour to an hour, I much prefer to just grab one of my 63mm Zeiss scopes and have a few quick looks at some bright stuff. If the Moon or a bright planet is up, I might opt to set up my 85mm Zeiss, even if it's only going to be clear for half an hour to an hour, because it performs reasonably well with only 15 minutes of cooldown, though it really need at least half an hour to perform at its best. I can set the 85mm on its EQ-6 up in less than ten minutes, even though it weighs 110lbs/50kg. Clear skies! Thomas, Denmark .............................................................................................. Mircea