

-----------------------------------

nobody

31 Dec 2013 11:49



-----------------------------------

Am gasit mai multe legaturi intre Svensmark si Antena 3:

Nevertheless, it has been noted by climate scientists actively publishing in the field that Svensmark has inconsistently altered data on most of his published work on the subject, an example being adjustment of cloud data that understates error in lower cloud data, but not in high cloud data.
&#8216;Cosmoclimatology&#8217; &#8211; tired old arguments in new clothes galactic cosmic rays, and total solar irradiance did not have any statistically significant influence on changes in cloud cover. causal climate change claims such as those made by Svensmark are shown to have been exaggerated.the cosmic ray rate did not match the changes in temperature, indicating that it was not a causal relationship.

Morala:
To ignore aspects that don&#8217;t fit the hypothesis is definitely not science.
Neither is adjusting data so to provide a good fit without a solid and convincing justification.
Furthermore, it is only a lack of respect for the readers to publish an article that doesn&#8217;t provide all relevant sides to the story.

