<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canon 60D, Nikon D7000, Pentax K-5, si Pentax K-r</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.astronomy.ro/canon-60d-nikon-d7000-pentax-k-5-si-pentax-k-r_1723.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.astronomy.ro/canon-60d-nikon-d7000-pentax-k-5-si-pentax-k-r_1723.html</link>
	<description>Primul Portal de Astronomie din Romania</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2026 00:34:53 +0200</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Perdele Bucatarie</title>
		<link>https://www.astronomy.ro/canon-60d-nikon-d7000-pentax-k-5-si-pentax-k-r_1723.html#comment-9450</link>
		<dc:creator>Perdele Bucatarie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2018 04:47:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.astronomy.ro/blog/?p=1723#comment-9450</guid>
		<description>Foarte tare aparatul! Tot in acelasi top, Canon 60D ocupa locul 40. Nikon D7000 nu a fost testat pana la aceasta ora, dar cred ca se va plasa peste Canon 60D.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Foarte tare aparatul! Tot in acelasi top, Canon 60D ocupa locul 40. Nikon D7000 nu a fost testat pana la aceasta ora, dar cred ca se va plasa peste Canon 60D.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
